​

Obligatory disclosure: I'm not a CIA historian or marketing expert. My knowledge of government mind control programs comes primarily from late-night internet rabbit holes and a healthy skepticism inherited from paying taxes. I once tried to read declassified intelligence documents but got distracted wondering if my search history would put me on a watchlist. So take everything here with a grain of salt – preferably not the kind they might have slipped into unwitting subjects' drinks in the 1950s.

Want to listen along? Here's the episode – https://www.thelongseventiespodcast.com/home/2021/12/20/088-mkultra-from-mind-control-to-marketing​

The Surveillance State's Family Tree: From Black Sites to Facebook

Insight: The podcast traces how government surveillance evolved from World War I through the Cold War to modern digital surveillance. It started with chemical warfare, expanded to biological warfare, and culminated in what they called "metaphysical warfare" – attempting to influence human behavior through various means including drugs, sensory deprivation, and psychological manipulation.

My Take: It's fascinating how we've gone from government spooks secretly dosing unwitting subjects with LSD to willingly giving our psychological profiles to Facebook (showing my age here, nowadays it is BeReal?). The tech is better now, but the goal remains the same: influence behavior at scale.

As someone who's spent the last decade watching the corporate world adopt increasingly sophisticated psychological manipulation techniques, I can't help but see the connection.

The irony isn't lost on me that I now spend hours scrolling through apps specifically engineered to keep me scrolling, using techniques pioneered by the very programs I find so disturbing. We've essentially outsourced mind control to the private sector, and they're much better at it than the government ever was.

The Church Committee: When America Briefly Cared About Secret Programs

Insight: In 1975, following Watergate and various whistleblower revelations, three major commissions investigated intelligence community activities: the Pike Committee, the Rockefeller Committee, and most famously, the Church Committee. These investigations exposed programs like MK Ultra, though CIA Director Helms had already ordered most files destroyed in 1973.

My Take: The 70s were wild – not just for bell-bottoms and disco, but for briefly lifting the curtain on government shenanigans. It's like America collectively sobered up after a decades-long Cold War bender and asked, "Wait, we did WHAT?"

This pattern keeps repeating itself. In the late 90s, a former NSA director wrote about the Echelon program (global communication surveillance), which everyone dismissed as conspiracy theory nonsense until Edward Snowden confirmed it all in 2013.

What's striking is how quickly we normalize these revelations. The marketing industry follows this exact playbook – a manipulative technique gets exposed, there's brief outrage, and then it becomes standard practice. It's exposure laundering: Remember when we were scandalized by cookies tracking our browsing habits? That became normalized. Then came Cambridge Analytica's psychological profiling? Normalized again. Now we shrug at algorithms that can predict our purchasing decisions better than we can ourselves. I've gone from covering my laptop camera with tape to accepting that if someone wants to watch me doom-scroll (yeah, right, doom-scroll) at midnight, they're punishing themselves more than me.

From Fort Detrick to Madison Avenue: The Geography of Manipulation

Insight: The podcast discusses various facilities used for MK Ultra research, including Fort Detrick in the eastern US and overseas "black sites" like Villa Schuster and Camp King in post-war Germany. These locations allowed researchers to conduct experiments that would have been unacceptable on American soil.

My Take: The geography of these programs reveals so much about their nature. When you need to go to another continent to do your "research," that's a pretty good sign you're on the wrong side of history.

Modern marketing has its own version of this geographic arbitrage. We outsource the most manipulative practices to countries with fewer regulations, then import the results. Ever wonder why all those sketchy mobile games with aggressive monetization schemes come from markets with minimal consumer protection laws? Or why certain data practices get developed in regulatory blind spots before being deployed globally? It's the digital equivalent of a black site – what happens in unregulated markets stays in unregulated markets, except for the data we extract.

As someone from newly baked Europe, this feels uncomfortably familiar. My grandmother used to tell stories about "special facilities" that everyone knew existed but no one acknowledged. The marketing world has its own unacknowledged truths – we all know certain practices are ethically questionable, but we rebrand them as "growth hacking" or "consumer insights" and carry on.

Sydney Gottlieb: The Original Mad Man

Insight: Sydney Gottlieb, a chemist who headed MK Ultra from 1953-1963, was a complex figure. Despite overseeing disturbing human experimentation, he personally embraced counterculture elements like meditation, folk dancing, and living off the grid. After retiring in 1973, he ran a leper colony in India with his wife.

My Take: Gottlieb might be the original "Mad Man" – not the slick Don Draper type, but literally a man using science to drive people mad while maintaining a bizarre double life. By day, he's overseeing mind control experiments; by night, he's doing folk dances and living an almost hippie lifestyle.

I've met the modern marketing equivalents – data scientists who build surveillance-capitalism tools by day while advocating for digital privacy in their personal lives. People who design some particularly invasive tracking systems wouldn't even use social media themselves because they "knew too much about how the sausage was made."

This compartmentalization is how we justify ethical compromises. We're all Gottliebs in our own small ways, separating our professional ethics from our personal values.

The Advertising Evolution: From Product Features to Psychological Manipulation

Insight: The podcast traces how advertising evolved from straightforward product descriptions to sophisticated psychological manipulation. Over decades, marketing moved from "This blender blends better than others" to techniques that target subconscious desires and fears.

My Take: This evolution is painfully obvious when you look at vintage ads versus modern campaigns. Early advertisements were almost charmingly direct – "This soap cleans better!" Today, we sell identities, emotions, and belonging – "This soap will make you feel like you've finally found your place in the world (and might help you get clean too, I guess)."

Looking at old advertisements is like watching psychological warfare evolve in real-time. Those 1950s ads saying "Smoke this brand of cigarettes or your husband will leave you" seem comically obvious now, but that's only because today's manipulation is more subtle. We've graduated from the psychological equivalent of a club to a scalpel.

From Crude NLP to Precision Targeting: Evolution of Manipulation Techniques

Insight: The podcast discusses how various psychological influence techniques evolved from government research into mainstream applications in business. Early approaches included Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP), which claimed to influence behavior through verbal and physical cues.

My Take: Ever had a salesperson use your name so many times in a conversation that you wanted to legally change it? That was the crude NLP approach - largely debunked by science but still weirdly persistent in sales seminars and self-help books.

What's fascinating is how we've moved from these pseudo-scientific techniques to the precision targeting revealed by the Cambridge Analytica scandal - using big data and psychographic profiling to identify exactly which emotional triggers work on specific personality types. We've gone from crude "mirror their body language" tricks to algorithms that can determine if you're neurotic, extroverted, or open to experience based on your digital footprint, then serve you tailored messaging designed specifically for your psychological profile.

What's particularly disturbing is how these methods have been systematized and scaled. It's no longer just the charismatic salesperson using these tricks – they're baked into our digital experiences, email sequences, and customer journey maps. The digital architecture around us isn't just showing us products - it's analyzing our behavior patterns, emotional responses, and psychological vulnerabilities, then exploiting them with surgical precision.

Even the architects of these systems are having second thoughts. The guy who wrote "Hooked" – literally the playbook for creating habit-forming products that Silicon Valley treated as its bible – is now scrambling to undo the damage with follow-up books about breaking free from technology addiction. It's the digital equivalent of inventing a highly addictive drug, writing the manufacturing instructions, and then years later publishing a pamphlet on rehab options while the world remains hooked on your creation.

When we pay with our attention and cash, we're unwittingly participating in the most sophisticated behavioral experiment in human history. Every click, purchase, pause, and scroll becomes data in an endless A/B/C/D...Z test designed to map exactly how this animal we call "human" reacts and can be exploited. The MK Ultra researchers could only dream of having test subjects voluntarily generate billions of behavioral data points daily, revealing precisely which stimuli trigger which responses in which contexts.

A colleague recently told me something that stuck with me: "I'm more afraid of the precision with which we can deliver weaponized information right now than I am of AI." While everyone panics about AI-generated content, the real danger might be in the delivery systems that already exist - the hyper-targeted infrastructure that can place exactly the right message in front of exactly the right person at exactly the right psychological moment. The bullet matters less than the ability to aim it directly at someone's psychological weak point with near-perfect accuracy.

The Dopamine Economy: From LSD to Like Buttons

Insight: MK Ultra extensively experimented with drugs, particularly LSD, to influence behavior and consciousness. Gottlieb himself reportedly took LSD hundreds of times and conducted "brainstorming sessions" where CIA employees would take acid together.

My Take: The ultimate irony of MK Ultra's legacy is that its goals – behavior modification and thought influence – have been achieved not through psychedelic drugs but through carefully engineered digital experiences. The CIA spent millions trying to control minds with LSD when all they needed was a like button and an infinite scroll.

Modern apps and platforms are essentially sophisticated dopamine delivery systems. Each notification, like, and autoplay feature is designed to trigger the same neurochemical responses that make drugs addictive. Have you ever noticed how the TikTok algorithm seems to know exactly what will keep you watching longer than you intended? That's not accidental – it's the result of thousands of A/B tests optimizing for your specific psychological triggers. And don't get me started on the "pull-to-refresh" gesture that mimics a slot machine's action, creating the same anticipatory dopamine hit. I've worked with UX designers who explicitly talked about creating "dopamine loops" to keep users engaged – language that would fit perfectly in an MK Ultra research proposal.

As someone who has caught myself opening TikTok immediately after closing it, I can attest to the effectiveness of these techniques. The difference is scale and consent – we've agreed to this manipulation, even if we don't fully understand its extent. It's like we've collectively decided that mind control is fine as long as it comes with cute cat videos and helps us avoid awkward elevator conversations.

The Expert Testimony Paradox: From CIA Directors to Brand Ambassadors

Insight: The podcast questions why news networks regularly feature former intelligence officials as experts, given that their professional training involves deception and manipulation. They compare this to the credibility boost of having dentists endorse toothpaste rather than just a neighbor's recommendation.

My Take: This perfectly parallels how marketing uses authority figures to bypass our critical thinking. We're skeptical of a random person recommending a product, but add a white coat or a credential, and suddenly we're reaching for our wallets.

The comparison to dentists endorsing toothpaste is spot-on but incomplete. It's more like having a professional con artist endorse an anti-theft device. Sure, they have relevant expertise, but perhaps not the kind that inspires confidence. Yet it works because we're wired to respond to perceived authority, even when that authority comes from the very system we should be questioning.

Final Thoughts: The Unbroken Chain

After diving into this rabbit hole of government mind control programs and their marketing descendants, what strikes me most is not how much has changed, but how much hasn't. The tools have evolved from crude chemical experiments to sophisticated digital manipulation, but the fundamental goal remains the same: understanding and influencing human behavior at scale.

The most successful aspect of these programs might be how thoroughly their techniques have been integrated into our daily lives. We're not being dragged to black sites and dosed with LSD (hopefully), but we are being psychologically profiled, manipulated, and influenced dozens of times daily – we just call it "user engagement" now.

Perhaps the most disturbing legacy of MK Ultra isn't the program itself, but how it normalized the idea that human consciousness is something to be hacked, optimized, and controlled. Whether it's government agencies, tech companies, or advertisers doing the manipulating seems almost secondary to the fact that we've accepted manipulation as inevitable.

So what can we do? Complete digital detox isn't realistic for most of us. But awareness itself is a form of resistance. Notice when you're being manipulated. Question the design patterns that make you feel anxious, inadequate, or compulsively engaged. Ask yourself: "Who benefits from me feeling this way right now?" Small acts of conscious engagement rather than passive consumption are tiny rebellions against the attention economy.

As I scroll through my social media feed, getting little dopamine hits from notifications while algorithms track my every preference, I can't help but wonder: Would Sydney Gottlieb be horrified by what his research helped create, or would he be impressed by how effectively we've been trained to participate in our own manipulation?

If you enjoyed this newsletter from someone whose primary qualification is having watched too many conspiracy documentaries while working in marketing (a combination that will give you trust issues for life), consider subscribing for more overthinking about the intersection of history, technology, and human psychology.

Want more paranoid but oddly compelling analysis in your inbox? Sign up below!

​